The Mean Value Theorem is one of the most important theorems in calculus. We look at some of its implications at the end of this section. First, let’s start with a special case of the Mean Value Theorem, called Rolle’s theorem.
Rolle’s Theorem
Informally, Rolle’s theorem states that if the outputs of a differentiable function are equal at the endpoints of an interval, then there must be an interior point where Figure 4.21 illustrates this theorem.

Proof
Let We consider three cases:
- for all
- There exists such that
- There exists such that
Case 1: If for all then for all
Case 2: Since is a continuous function over the closed, bounded interval by the extreme value theorem, it has an absolute maximum. Also, since there is a point such that the absolute maximum is greater than Therefore, the absolute maximum does not occur at either endpoint. As a result, the absolute maximum must occur at an interior point Because has a maximum at an interior point and is differentiable at by Fermat’s theorem,
Case 3: The case when there exists a point such that is analogous to case 2, with maximum replaced by minimum.
□
An important point about Rolle’s theorem is that the differentiability of the function is critical. If is not differentiable, even at a single point, the result may not hold. For example, the function is continuous over and but for any as shown in the following figure.

Let’s now consider functions that satisfy the conditions of Rolle’s theorem and calculate explicitly the points where
The Mean Value Theorem and Its Meaning
Rolle’s theorem is a special case of the Mean Value Theorem. In Rolle’s theorem, we consider differentiable functions defined on a closed interval with . The Mean Value Theorem generalizes Rolle’s theorem by considering functions that do not necessarily have equal value at the endpoints. Consequently, we can view the Mean Value Theorem as a slanted version of Rolle’s theorem (Figure 4.25). The Mean Value Theorem states that if is continuous over the closed interval and differentiable over the open interval then there exists a point such that the tangent line to the graph of at is parallel to the secant line connecting and

Proof
The proof follows from Rolle’s theorem by introducing an appropriate function that satisfies the criteria of Rolle’s theorem. Consider the line connecting and Since the slope of that line is
and the line passes through the point the equation of that line can be written as
Let denote the vertical difference between the point and the point on that line. Therefore,

Since the graph of intersects the secant line when and we see that Since is a differentiable function over is also a differentiable function over Furthermore, since is continuous over is also continuous over Therefore, satisfies the criteria of Rolle’s theorem. Consequently, there exists a point such that Since
we see that
Since we conclude that
□
One application that helps illustrate the Mean Value Theorem involves velocity. For example, suppose we drive a car for 1 h down a straight road with an average velocity of 45 mph. Let and denote the position and velocity of the car, respectively, for h. Assuming that the position function is differentiable, we can apply the Mean Value Theorem to conclude that, at some time the speed of the car was exactly
Corollaries of the Mean Value Theorem
Let’s now look at three corollaries of the Mean Value Theorem. These results have important consequences, which we use in upcoming sections.
At this point, we know the derivative of any constant function is zero. The Mean Value Theorem allows us to conclude that the converse is also true. In particular, if for all in some interval then is constant over that interval. This result may seem intuitively obvious, but it has important implications that are not obvious, and we discuss them shortly.
Proof
Since is differentiable over must be continuous over Suppose is not constant for all in Then there exist where and Choose the notation so that Therefore,
Since is a differentiable function, by the Mean Value Theorem, there exists such that
Therefore, there exists such that which contradicts the assumption that for all
□
From Corollary 1: Functions with a Derivative of Zero, it follows that if two functions have the same derivative, they differ by, at most, a constant.
Proof
Let Then, for all By Corollary 1, there is a constant such that for all Therefore, for all
□
This fact is important because it means that for a given function if there exists a function such that then, the only other functions that have a derivative equal to are for some constant We discuss this result in more detail later in the chapter.
The third corollary of the Mean Value Theorem discusses when a function is increasing and when it is decreasing. Recall that a function is increasing over if whenever whereas is decreasing over if whenever Using the Mean Value Theorem, we can show that if the derivative of a function is positive, then the function is increasing; if the derivative is negative, then the function is decreasing (Figure 4.29). We make use of this fact in the next section, where we show how to use the derivative of a function to locate local maximum and minimum values of the function, and how to determine the shape of the graph.

Proof
We will prove i.; the proof of ii. is similar. Suppose is continuous and differentiable over an interval and for all . By way of contradiction, suppose that is not an increasing function on . Then there exist and in such that , but . Since is a differentiable function over , the Mean Value Theorem guarantees that there is some value such that
Now , so . Because , it follows that . It follows that the quotient of and is negative. So, for c,
However, for all including . This is a contradiction. The assumption that is not an increasing function on is false. Therefore, must be increasing throughout .
□
Key Concepts
- If is continuous over and differentiable over and then there exists a point such that This is Rolle’s theorem.
